Sunday, 17 June 2012

The Bohr Theory of the Hydrogen Atom: Part II


This post will focus on some equation manipulation regarding how to derive the equations for the radius of the hydrogen atom and the velocity of an electron according to Bohr Theory. Also, we will examine the significance of these findings on the properties of the hydrogen atom. This will be done for the level of a first year university student, and the objective is to make these equations as clear to follow as possible.


The last post discussed how classical physics lacked the ability to describe the discrete spectrum of the atom as well as its set radius. Our man Bohr equated the classical physics equation for a force in circular motion (assuming the electron in the atom maintained a circular orbit), with the force of electric charge, also known as Coulomb's Law. 

             (A)

As an aside, let’s recall some formulae from circular motion, a favourite topic from first year physics. Knowing from Newton’s second law that  and that acceleration in circular motion is given by , clearly .  Also, taking the charge squared per atomic mass unit is defined by Coulomb's Law.

Moving onward, we see from equation (A) that the r cancels. This provides us with:


   (B)


Note that already we can tell some pretty neat things about the energy of the atom from equation (B). Remember that and .  So the kinetic energy is equal to twice the potential energy with opposite sign. Cool!

Now, we factor momentum into the equation. Recall regular good old momentum is defined as  Angular momentum is defined as angular momentum= where r is the position from the origin of the circle. In the last post, we discussed that Bohr quantized angular momentum as  for discrete values of n. You guessed it! We are going to equate the two definitions of angular momentum and see where this leads us.

             (C)

Next, we multiply both sides of the equation (B) byto make the equation into a more workable form. I am going to show all of the steps so things don’t get too hairy.

         (D)

But aha! We recognize equation (D) to be equation (C) squared! We substitute for  obtaining

           (E)

And then we solve for the radius of the atom, r, obtaining

         (F)

Note that  which is a nicer way to express equation (F), however as I can’t figure out how to write many symbols on my mac (not that I would be able to even find them on a windows, not going to lie), you’ll have to write it out for yourself and save a few extra characters.

At last, plug in the values for the the mass of the electron, the electric charge, Planck’s constant, and pi and you obtain the constant 0.530 A. Which means you can compute your problem sets with a much simpler version of equation (F) to punch into the calculator.

                (G)


Sometimes it is rather useful to calculate the velocity of an electron. We do this under Bohr Theory by referring way back to equation (C) and isolating for velocity.

            (H)

Then we substitute in equation (F) for the radius.


But this looks dreadfully ugly, so we take pity and clean it up a bit. First, we take the reciprocal of the denominator and then we collect like terms to see what cancels easily.


And finally, we have simplified for the velocity of the electron of the atom:

           (I)

HURRAH!

Another comment about Bohr’s assumptions is that he assumed the nucleus of the atom was stationary. It is not. To account for the motion of the nucleus something called the reduced mass of the electron is used in the equation. It is given by , but at the first year university level, no one is ever going to expect you to know that. However, no one is ever going to expect you to derive the above either, so just the exposure to it is good.

FIN




The Bohr Theory of the Hydrogen Atom: Part I


I am working my way through Linus Pauling’s General Chemistry book slowly in a rather haphazard fashion. Sometimes I skim, sometimes I read… I realize this post is incongruous with the rest of this blog, but I was rather excited about this derivation and I felt like sharing. Anyway, I am not an expert on this topic (far from it, I read this stuff before bed if I’m lucky to read it at all, and am completely half asleep, or as much as you can be completely half ) so if you have questions I suggest you look elsewhere (eg: Wikipedia). My professor did go over this at one point, but he went way above the level of a first year course, and it was invigorating as well as intimidating. So I am going to break this down in a way that hopefully will make sense to the general chemistry masses. :) And if not, well, oops. :P

Usually textbooks start off by telling you about the discrete spectrum of the hydrogen atom, which is a distinctive pattern of lines of certain frequencies emitted as one electron returns to a lower state releasing a photon. I enjoy the analogy to an atomic fingerprint, because it sounds cool. Then the textbook gets more complicated and the coloured line drawings turn into a set of calculations explaining the properties of the hydrogen atom.

When Bohr was investigating the hydrogen atom, he was the link between the classical physics perspective and the new-fangled quantum mechanics explanation. His explanation was not completely right, but according to one source I came across, should not be belittled, as it was significant for his time (such as the cassette player is to the mp3 file today or something).  So don’t bully Bohr, not that we were about to with all his brilliance! Anyway, down to business now.

Let’s recall a concept from classical physics. The hydrogen atom has two charges, a positive nucleus, and a negative electron. These two charges should follow the charge force of attraction equation (Coulomb’s Law) given by:




Note: I expressed the qs by an E only because I was previously more familiar with the q notation (and anticipate many high school/first year university students will be as well), but I will continue to use the E notation to signify charge for the rest of this post series.

BUT classical physics was found to have some problems in regards to the hydrogen atom.  Sadly, all was not well and orderly with the universe and human understanding. (It still isn’t, but we’re getting better supposedly, but that is another discussion)

EM theory states that the electron should produce light. This frequency of light should equal the frequency of rotation in the atom. And this should produce a continuous spectrum of light, as the electron would approach the nucleus more and more closely.  The typical description of the motion of the electron in the atom is to imagine it orbiting like the earth around the sun.

However, observation shows us the hydrogen atom does NOT do this at all. In fact the hydrogen atom has
1) a discrete spectrum (that cool atomic fingerprint)
2)   a volume with diameter 1 A (this A is supposed to have a little circle on the top, I can’t figure out the notation)

This means that the hydrogen atom is not able to have a range of wavelengths, as it only has a few. Also, the electron’s orbit does not run towards the nucleus, it is actually pretty fixed. If classical physics held, the electron would run into the nucleus so quickly that the atom would fail to exist, and that would be pretty disastrous indeed you must admit.

So classical physics fails to explain these issues in a satisfactory nature, and another explanation is necessary.

Bohr to the rescue! (Well, almost!)


Bohr had a couple of clues to aid him with developing his model. First came Planck’s quantum theory of the emission of light and then Einstein’s theory of the photoelectric effect and the light quantum. Hopefully, the reader is familiar with these ideas, but perhaps I will do a post about them later (not that there isn’t heaps of material about this out there anyway). In brief, 

Bohr’s idea in compact terms was that the hydrogen atom can exist only in certain discrete states, known as stationary states. He defined the ground/normal state to be the state of minimum energy possible for the atom. Any other state of higher energy is called the excited states of the atom.

The frequency emitted (or absorbed) is given by:



where E" is the excited state and E' is the lower state of energy.

The big deal about Bohr is pretty much that he calculated the energy of stationary states of the hydrogen atom with Planck’s constant – quantizing the hydrogen atom, or more specifically, its angular momentum. Which gets me in a pretty excited state just thinking about it!  

He assumed the orbits of the electron are circular, and defined the angular momentum of the electron as follows:

Angular momentum: n ħ             n = 1,2,3…
Where n=1 is the ground state

n is defined as the principal quantum number (this little blighter will come back and bite you in the pants, trust me)

*** A quick spoiler alert as we will derive this equation next post, in addition to a formula for velocity of the electron! ***

The atomic radius is defined as
 for an atom with atomic number Z, where 

m is the mass of the electron, and E is its charge

It is also worthwhile to mention that the total energy is given by 


but don’t stress too much about the first form of the equation – it never showed up on a first year test. The important one to remember is probably the second form of the equation. :) 

Friday, 15 June 2012

Editing! When will it be over? I have been working on a 3000 word piece for over a year now, and would like to be done with it before I reach the age where I will not have the guts to share it with other people. My dad read it and gave an opinion - apparently it lacks maturity at the beginning and gains it in full force towards the end as my writing style changed. Now I have to rewrite the beginning! Injustice! NO! And - apparently it is rather dark, Emily. Of course! What am I to write about, merry-go-rounds? :P No way! I refuse whole-heartedly.


Thursday, 7 June 2012

Bring me back


  • Oh bring me back to Montréal
    to city scape and pavement grey
    bring me yonder campus built
    there I shall ponder and shall stay
    oh walk me up to Mile End
    and take me out for bagels fair
    let us question and converse
    oh bring me back home to there

    (Poem written on May 12th in 3 minutes in multiple facebook status/comment dealios... Don't judge. :P)